The Lowest Scoring Game in NBA History: An In-Depth Look

Minneapolis Lakers 18-19 Fort Wayne Pistons

• This 1950 game stands out as the lowest-scoring game in the NBA history, ending with a combined final score of 37 points. This uncommon result was majorly associated with the absence of a shot clock, which caused teams to stagnate and hold the ball for prolonged moments without taking a shot.
• The Lakers’ dominance threatened the Pistons, currently known as Detroit Pistons and one of the teams with a record of the longest losing streak in NBA history. The Pistons retaliated against the Lakers by engaging in a calculated move of deliberate stalling. The ultimate plan was clear, to frustrate George Mikan, Lakers superstar at the time, and limit his chances of acquiring the ball. The inexistence of the shot clock made it impossible to hinder such unwarranted tactics. 
• The game dragged at an intolerable pace, as possession lasted for minutes. Moreover, in the early 1950s, basketball was more defense-oriented and methodical, unlike today where games are fast-paced and reliant on a high-scoring style. Also due to the lack of modern spacing and poor shooting, games were often low-scoring affairs. 
• This game triggered iconic changes, leading to the introduction of a shot clock in 1954. The aim was to discourage stalling moments and transform games into exciting, offense-based encounters. The 24-second clock introduced transformative changes in the NBA by enhancing scoring, thus creating a path for the fast-paced, dynamic style of play experienced today. 

• In the 1940s, low-scoring affairs were a common phenomenon that seemed like a typical occurrence. The games played between 1946 and 1947 managed consistently low scores. In that era, there were awfully poor game standards, given that it was an evolutionary period. 
• The shot clock was not in the vicinity yet, which translated to longer possession periods, low-scoring attempts and a sheer lack of urgency in offensive execution. Offensive sets were deliberately calibrated to minimal scoring chances and slower ball movement.
• Players redirected more attention to methodical, half-court games that created limited scoring opportunities. Defenses were more indulged that offenses, as they majorly focused on controlling the tempo. The defense was more reliable since they were exceptional in hindering ball movement and holding onto it for long stretches. In hindsight, defenses matured at a faster pace and became impactful when offensive strategies were still at infancy level. 
• Inefficient shooting and the lack of scoring also emanated from low-level shooting techniques, inadequate training and limited equipment. Offensive strategies such as jump shots were unpopular, with most scoring attempts being executed from hook shots, set shots, and layups. The three-point line was inexistent; hence long-range shots were unheard of. Therefore, offenses were simply bare and a walk over for defenses.